EAST AMWELL
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Municipal Building – 7:30 PM
August 14, 2007
Call to order and compliance with the Open Public
Meetings Act
The regular meeting of the
Board of Adjustment was called to order at 7:30 PM on August 14, 2007 in the
Main Meeting Room of the Municipal Building, 1070 Route 202/31, Ringoes, NJ by
Chairman, Pete Kneski.
In compliance with the Open
Public Meetings Act, the Administrative Officer announced this was a regularly
scheduled meeting pursuant to the Meeting Notice as published in the January
18, 2007 issue of the Hunterdon County Democrat, filed in the Township Clerk’s
Office, and posted on the Bulletin Board on August 7, 2007.
Roll Call and Agenda Review
Present: Nancy Cunningham
Gloria
Frederick
Paul
Gavzy
Pete
Kneski
Freda
Routh
Sue
Posselt
Absent: Gael Gardner
Kathi
Hoffman
Sherrie
Binder
Chairman Kneski acknowledged
the resignation of Board Member Kathi Hoffman and extended appreciation for her
years of service and dedication to the Board and the Township.
A motion by Paul Gavzy,
seconded by Freda Routh to approve the minutes from 6/12/07 was approved with
Sue Posselt abstaining.
A motion by Paul Gavzy,
seconded by Gloria Frederick to approve the minutes from 7/10/07 was approved
with Freda Routh abstaining.
A motion by Gloria Frederick,
seconded by Paul Gavzy to approve the bills for payment as listed on the agenda
was unanimously approved.
Chairman Kneski noted that
the correspondence will be dealt with as it comes up over the course of the meeting.
Ms. Posselt commented that the July/August 2007 edition of the New Jersey
Planner Newsletter had an excellent article on the “courage to deny use
variances” and suggested everyone read it.
There were no applications to
be deemed complete.
Applications for Public Hearing
Virginia and Theodore Peyrek – Block 31 Lot 5.04 – AJ-07-06 – 26 Linvale Road
Present for the application
was Virginia and Theodore Peyrek. They came forward and were sworn in. The
proposed application is for an in-ground pool on the property. A bulk variance
is required for impervious coverage which will increase to 9%. Mr. Peyrek noted
that his property already exceeded the maximum allowed coverage of 5% when he
bought it due to the length of the driveway. The Peyrek’s
East Amwell Township Board of Adjustment Minutes –
August 14, 2007
reduced the size of some of
the proposed walkways in an effort to limit the impervious coverage.
Additionally, they have relocated trees and therefore, no trees will need to be
cut down in order for the pool to be installed.
Engineer O’Neal’s report
confirms the project will not create any Stormwater Management issues.
Sue Posselt read the site
review report for the record, a copy of which is attached.
A motion by Paul Gavzy,
seconded by Nancy Cunningham to open to the public was unanimously approved. No
one came forward. A motion by Paul Gavzy, seconded by Nancy Cunningham to close
to the public was unanimously approved.
A motion by Paul Gavzy,
seconded by Gloria Frederick to approve the application was unanimously
approved.
Roll Call Vote:
Paul Gavzy: Yes, Gloria Frederick: Yes, Nancy Cunningham: Yes, Pete Kneski:
Yes, Freda Routh: Yes, Sue Posselt: Yes
Old Business
Status of “Meeting Procedure” Information Sheet
Ms. Cunningham reviewed the
existing procedure sheet, noting each new proposed revision. It was the
consensus of the Board to have Ms. Andrews include the revised information
sheet in the Board’s packets next month for final review before actual
“reformatting” is done. Attorney Waterbury commented that it may be a good idea
to include the Board’s meeting procedures in a future edition of the VIP so the
community is aware of the process.
New Business
Review of Employee Evaluation Form(s)
The Board discussed the new
evaluation forms implemented by Township Administrator Matheny and the process
by which evaluations will be done. It was the consensus of the Board that each
member will provide evaluation input regarding Administrative Officer Andrews’
job performance to Chairman Kneski who will then forward a compilation of the
comments to Mr. Matheny for his input.
Open to the Public
Chairman Kneski opened the
floor for any public comment. No one came forward. A motion by Paul Gavzy,
seconded by Freda Routh to close to the public was unanimously approved.
Comments of the Board Members
Ms. Posselt commented on the
discussion that had taken place at last month’s meeting regarding vouchers and
how they are listed on the agendas and in the minutes. She questioned whether
or not Secretary’s payroll vouchers needed to be listed on the agendas stating,
“There are some boards here that do not mention what their Secretary’s are
making and it’s not even on the agendas.” Ms. Posselt noted that the salaries
are listed on the Planning Board agenda, but not on the Board of Health or
Environmental Commission agendas. Ms. Routh replied, “What they get paid has to
be on the agenda.” Ms. Posselt stated, “It is not...what I am saying is that I
really feel it should be the same for every board.” Mr. Kneski commented, “In
the beginning of the year the Board adopts a budget—a salary budget. That
budget is adopted through the Township Committee which is a set salary.
Basically the money that Maria is getting paid from has already been allocated
and adopted by Township Committee, so I don’t understand the reason why we have
to approve Maria’s bills every month.” Attorney Waterbury added, “They are not
East Amwell Township Board of Adjustment Minutes –
August 14, 2007
even really in the nature of
bills, this is salary. Your consultants—you have to approve the bills because
those are basically contractual and until somebody approves them they can’t be
paid.” It was the consensus of the Board that Ms. Andrews does not have to
include her payroll vouchers on the agenda. Chairman Kneski will speak with
Township Administrator Matheny about the consistency issue regarding other
Board’s including payroll vouchers on their agendas.
Ms. Cunningham commented that
since Ms. Hoffman’s resignation, the Board does not have a designated Vice
Chair. Attorney Waterbury suggested the matter be listed on next month’s agenda
for the nomination to take place then.
Attorney Comments
Attorney Waterbury provided
the Board with a brief update on the Maier litigation. She stated, “If you remember,
he had filed a lawsuit a while back challenging your denial of his appeal and
had done it really to preserve his rights while he went forward with his
variance application.” It was explained that since we are still within the 45
day time frame for anyone to file an appeal on the Board granting the use of
the baseball field, Mr. Maier doesn’t want to withdraw his lawsuit until he is
sure no one else is coming forward to challenge the variance. Attorney
Waterbury explained that during the Case Management Conference several weeks
ago, it was agreed that a new conference will be scheduled for September after
the 45 day time frame has expired. Attorney Waterbury also stated that it was
noted during the conference that Mr. Maier was not happy the Board denied the
variance to encroach within the 75’ setback. She stated that she wasn’t sure if
he planned to amend his complaint or simply live with the denial.
A motion by Paul Gavzy,
seconded by Nancy Cunningham to adjourn was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned
at 8:34 PM.
________________________________
Maria Andrews, Administrative
Officer